Idiopathic bone cavity (IBC), also known as simple or traumatic bone cyst, is defined by the World Health Organization as a non-neoplastic intraosseous pseudocyst devoid of epithelial lining1. With its lack of cystic lining, histopathological confirmation of IBC can be achieved in some cases where fibrous tissues are present, but is difficult since collecting tissue samples within an empty cavity often is not possible1,2. IBC is often asymptomatic, occurs in young patients in their second to third decade of life2, and is a solitary lesion3, in the posterior site of the mandible, and shows no association with sex4. Despite its clear description, the pathogenesis of idiopathic bone cavity remains unclear3,5. Thus, it is uncertain whether surgical intervention is necessary3 or if a surgically untreated lesion could yield spontaneous resolution. Few studies have reported cases of spontaneous resolution of surgically untreated IBC, but a longer follow-up period was needed to observe complete resolution5. Discacciati et al.6 suggest differentiation from a lesion with other maxillofacial cystic or neoplastic pathologies can be based on clinical and radiographical findings, but surgical exploration can serve as a definitive diagnostic tool. Its many names reflect the diverse clinical and radiological presentation of idiopathic bone cavity, and more extensive studies are needed to increase understanding of the lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic characteristics of idiopathic bone cavity and the necessity of surgical intervention.
A search of all cases that were first diagnosed as idiopathic bone cavity among patients from 2011 to 2020, at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital (Yangsan, Korea) was conducted. Inclusion criteria for these cases were availability of diagnostic X-rays; clinical, radiographic, and surgical description of the lesion; and histopathology. The follow-up period differed by case so postoperative comparison of lesions was based on the cases that had a greater than six-month follow-up period and radiographic images.
Any case that was diagnosed as idiopathic bone cavity but did not undergo surgical treatment was not included in the study. Lesions that were misdiagnosed and cases where patients had systemic disease that might interfere with healing also were excluded.
Clinical parameters evaluated were sex, age, clinical symptoms, pulp vitality, bone expansion (Fig. 1), lesion contour (Fig. 2), number of teeth involved, location of lesion, history of trauma, and postoperative healing pattern.
The Mann–Whitney U test and chi-square test were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (ver. 25.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
A total of 90 cases was included in this study.(Table 1) All cases had preoperative cone-beam computed tomography data and panoramic radiographs. The mean age at presentation of IBC was 22.05±14.38 years, which ranged from 10 to 58 years. There was no predilection between the two sexes. A single case was observed in the maxilla, with the remaining cases in the mandibular region. History of trauma associated with the lesion was acquired at the first visit and documented, but most cases showed no specific traumatic incidence. The legion size was measured in two categories with respect to the adjacent teeth involved, either of equal or smaller size than three teeth or greater than three teeth. The majority of cases (65 cases) involved three or fewer teeth. Patients younger than 20 years showed more lesions (21 cases) associated with a larger size than did the older (four cases) group (
The pathogenesis of IBC remains theoretical despite its widely investigated clinical and radiological features. Among the major etiologic hypotheses, three have achieved some agreement and predominate: 1) abnormality of bone growth, 2) tumor degeneration, and 3) traumatism. The first two factors are based on clinical observation, and the third hypothesis considers the interaction between lesion pathogenesis and etiology. According to Harnet et al.7, traumatism is the most widely accepted theory, and it advocates vascular alterations caused by intramedullary hemorrhage after traumatic force on the lesion. Discacciati et al.6 also investigated these three factors, but they failed to observe significant results6.
The ambiguity of pathogenesis is partly due to various clinical and radiological features of IBCs. In many reported cases, presentation of IBCs varies by sex, size, preferential location, shape, recurrence, etc. Many studies have investigated clinical and radiological findings of IBCs in an effort to form differential diagnosis of the lesion from other benign intraosseous lesions, including odontogenic keratocyst, ameloblastoma, central giant cell lesions, lateral periodontal cysts, periapical cysts, and other odontogenic cysts4. Specifically, since radiological findings of IBCs mimic those of other cysts of the oral region, it is essential to investigate further to decide whether treatment intervention or follow-up observation is necessary. Some studies advocate conservative treatment as long as patients are free of symptoms since IBC is a benign lesion8. A sexual predilection exists in some reviews and case reports6,9-12, while others including Rushton13 reveal no such predilection14-16. Our study, however, is in accordance with the latter case (male to female ratio as 0.9:1.0). In general, it is agreed that IBCs often are found incidentally in the second to third decades of life, with a location predominantly in the mandible; this correlates with the data from our study10,12,17. You et al.10 reported the posterior mandible as the most common site, followed by the anterior region. Topographical distribution of all our cases, except one in the maxilla, was significantly higher in the posterior region of the mandible. In addition, 27 cases showed a lesion size greater than three teeth, and most of these patients were in their 20s, which confirmed a significant size difference between the younger and older groups. There was no association between degree of cortical bone expansion and existing symptoms, and a mild degree of expansion was most common. Although solitary and unilocular radiolucency is most common in IBCs18, multiple IBCs were found in about 11% of cases11. Most of these lesions were treated surgically, and recurrence was rare11,19. Three cases showed bilateral lesion in the mandible and were diagnosed originally as keratocystic odontogenic tumor, after which surgical exploration confirmed the diagnosis as IBC. A characteristic IBC trait is scalloping of the lesion projection into the interdental or interradicular spaces2. Scalloping borderlines were seen in about 40% of IBCs1; however, our study showed equal proportions of scalloped and rounded lesion contours.
Considering the atypical presentation of IBCs and the diversity of theories put forward in the literature, the preferred treatment option is clear. Especially when routine check-ups reveal enlargement of a lesion, a surgical approach is logical8. Since final diagnosis and treatment can be performed simultaneously in the same surgical procedure and as shown in our data, it is reasonable to consider surgical management of the lesion20. Surgical curettage or exploration can stimulate bony growth by generating new blood flow into the site2,3,9.
Multiple treatment modalities exist to stimulate the healing process of the emptied bone cavity. Treatment options include no surgical intervention with expectation of spontaneous healing and a surgical approach that can involve exploration, curettage, fenestration, autologous bone marrows injection, cavity packing, etc.1,14. The effectiveness of these treatment modalities is not known14, and there is no consensus on treatment protocol. Our data, however, suggest that simple curettage of the lesion was sufficient to yield bone regeneration that is detectable through X-rays. One surgical procedure was needed to confirm the tentative diagnosis and rule out other oral pathologies; treatment was spontaneous healing.
Like the many synonyms for idiopathic bone cavity, its etiology remains unclear. The diagnosis of idiopathic bone cavity relies primarily on radiographic interpretation or the surgical finding of an empty bone cavity with a lack of epithelial lining. Our data suggest that surgical intervention be the first choice of treatment for stimulating healing of idiopathic bone cavity.
J.R. participated in data collection and wrote the manuscript. I.N., Y.D.K., and S.H.S. participated in the study design and performed the statistical analysis. J.Y.L. participated in the study design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The study was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Dental Hospital (IRB No. PNUDH-2021-030).
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Clinical variables of idiopathic bone cavity and statistical data (n=90)
|Age (yr)||22.05±14.38 (10-58)||-|
|Cortical bone thinning|
|Equal to or less than three teeth involved||70||0.735|
|Greater than three teeth involved||20|
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range) or number only.
Comparative analysis of distribution by lesion size and age (n=90)
|Size less or greater than three teeth involved||
|Less (n=65)||Greater (n=25)|
|≤20 yr (n=62)||41 (45.6)||21 (23.3)||0.038
|>20 yr (n=28)||24 (26.7)||4 (0.4)|
Values are presented as number (%).
Lesions with less than 3 teeth involved considered as smaller lesion. Lesions with greater than 3 teeth involved considered as larger lesion.