Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons : eISSN 2234-5930 / pISSN 2234-7550

Table. 2.

Table. 2.

Difficulty index of mandibular third molar (M3M) surgery in relation to mandibular second molar (M2M)

Parameter Score
Spatial relationship with M2M1
Mesioangular Long axis of M3M parallel to M2M 1
Horizontal Long axis of M3M perpendicular to M2M 2
Vertical Long axis of M3M inclined in mesial direction to M2M 3
Distoangular Long axis of M3M inclined in distal direction to M2M 4
Depth of impaction in relation to occlusal of M2M2
Position A Uppermost portion of M3M is located at or above OP of M2M 1
Position B Uppermost portion of M3M is located between OP and cervical line of M2M 2
Position C Uppermost portion of M3M is located below cervical line of M2M 3
Available space in relation between mandibular ramus and distal part of M2M2
Class I Sufficient space between MR and distal part of M2M for accommodation of the mesio-distal width of M3M 1
Class II Not enough space between MR and distal part of M2M for accommodation of the mesio-distal width of M3M 2
Class III All or most of M3M is in MR 3
Total score 3 to 10

(OP: occlusal plane, MR: ramus of the mandible)

1Described by Winter14. 2Described by Pell and Gregory15.

Total score of three parameters is categorized as follows: minimally difficult, 3-4; moderately difficult, 5-7; very difficult, 8-10.

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;48:363~370
https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.6.363
© JKAOMS