J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 43(4): 214~220
Clinical and biological analysis in graftless maxillary sinus lift
Marcelo Parra1, Sergio Olate2,3,4, Mario Cantín3,4
1Master in Dental Science Program, Universidad de La Frontera,
2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidad de La Frontera,
3Center of Excellence in Surgical and Morphological Studies (CEMYQ), Universidad de La Frontera,
4Center for Biomedical Research, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco, Chile
Sergio Olate
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidad de La Frontera,Claro Solar 115, Of. 414-A, Temuco 4780000, Chile
TEL: +56-452325000 FAX: +56-452325001 E-mail: sergio.olate@ufrontera.cl ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-0676
Received June 28, 2016; Revised August 5, 2016; Accepted August 26, 2016.; Published online August 31, 2017.
© Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 Abstract
Maxillary sinus lift for dental implant installation is a well-known and versatile technique; new techniques are presented based on the physiology of intrasinus bone repair. The aim of this review was to determine the status of graftless maxillary sinus lift and analyze its foundations and results. A search was conducted of the literature between 1995 and 2015 in the Medline, ScienceDirect, and SciELO databases using the keywords “maxillary sinus lift,” “blood clot,” “graftless maxillary sinus augmentation,” and “dental implant placement.” Ten articles were selected for our analysis of this technique and its results. Despite the limited information, cases that were followed for at least six months and up to four years had a 90% success rate. Published techniques included a lateral window, elevation of the sinus membrane, drilling and dental implant installation, descent of the membrane with variations in the installation of the lateral wall access and suturing. The physiology behind this new bone formation response and the results of the present research were also discussed. We concluded that this is a promising and viable technique under certain inclusion criteria.
Keywords: Maxillary sinus, Blood clotting, Sinus floor augmentation


Current Issue

31 August 2017
Vol. 43
No. 4 pp. 213~285

Indexed in